At one of England's most prestigious schools, Eton, students were required to wear black top hats and tails on and off campus until 1972, when the dress codes began to be relaxed. This means a school uniform may not allow for a reduction in violence common in schools. We should not rely on school uniforms to swipe the problems under the rug, this does the students no good. Expression is often more internal than it is external. Ultimately, wearing a uniform can be seen as something that students do for others because they want to show respect for others by presenting themselves nicely.
Parents already pay taxes, and they still need to buy regular clothes for their children to wear when they're out of school and for dress-down days. A 1994 peer-reviewed study found that students in uniform were perceived by teachers and fellow students as being more academically proficient than students in regular clothes. The debate goes on in schools and at homes. At least it saves you from deciding long on what to wear for a school day. Boys have almost as many choices: dress shirts, turtlenecks, polo or button-down shirts, pants or knee-length shorts. From Los Angeles to Louisiana, from Maryland to Miami, public schools are discussing, and in many cases adopting, the old private school idea.
Check with your school to see what the dress code is, as they can be fairly specific. When uniforms are mandatory, parents and students do not spend time choosing appropriate outfits for the school day. However, not everyone finds them convenient or desirable, and children and parents have their own views. Doing one week's worth of laundry for just school clothes will simplify the process and allows your child to focus on what's more important: going to school. Furthermore, it prevents them from developing their personal style, by which they will be known and defined.
Students may still express their views through other mediums during the school day. What works for one school may not be the best practice in another. Parents already pay taxes, and they still need to buy regular clothes for their children to wear when they're out of school and for dress-down days. There is no self-expression at all. This choice could go mostly unnoticed in a school where uniforms were not required, and she could feel more comfortable in her dress choices. School uniforms are vital for school safety in the 21st century -- this needs to be remembered in any school uniforms debate. So what if your kid says that all the cool kids have Nike shirts? Learn more about how we are assisting thousands of students each academic year.
Pro made 3 claims and Con did not rebut. Therefore, it is reasonable to argue that if school children were allowed to pick their own clothes, then they would learn better because they feel more comfortable. This helps create a safer environment for the students, and also helps protect them and keep them together on field trips. A 1994 peer-reviewed study found that students in uniform were perceived by teachers and fellow students as being more academically proficient than students in regular clothes. More recently, found that after a year of having a uniform policy at a middle school in Nevada, school police data showed a 63% decrease in police log reports. School uniforms ensure that all students attending a school wear practical clothes that are appropriate for both learn and play.
Finally, uniform policies are difficult to enforce in public schools and the assertion that a uniform policy helps to set high academic standards is difficult to prove, especially when some of the highest-achieving countries have no uniform. The clothing that students wear has a small impact. Further, many teachers and parents feel students should express themselves by choosing what they wear. Uniforms do not silence voices. Dress code helps cover the important parts of the body but letting them choose what to wear is giving them freedom and I feel like taking away that is basically taking away their freedom. Now they're gonna get them to look alike, too? Later the same year, California Governor Pete Wilson signed a bill officially allowing schools to implement mandatory uniform policies. Not speaking of gym shorts and socks or sports uniforms, which should be afforded and provided by the school district.
Only use this feature if you are certain this user has infringed netivist's. When students have to wear the same outfits, rather than being allowed to select clothes that suit their body types, they can suffer embarrassment at school. And if it's costly, at least you could wear it for the rest of the school year -- it even saves you from further cost on spending more clothes. Who wears it best is what they strive to achieve with the school uniforms and it may even create a more significant divide than when not wearing uniforms. They are colorless and just plain boring. I can't stand it anymore. They come in pleated pants, navy or khaki.
Former President Bill Clinton is perhaps the most famous and influential advocate of school uniforms. In a 2014 inquiry carried out in the U. Over a half-million elementary-school students in New York City will have to adhere to a dress code by the fall of 1999. This is easily spotted in time for staff to take appropriate action to protect the children. Some schools specify a certain manufacturer or store to ensure uniformity, making it harder to find competitive pricing. Even those school uniforms that are particularly bad can create a sense of common suffering among students.
What is important to know is that implementing any rule without consent will not always be well-received. Sometimes, however, dress codes are nearly as strict, as in the case of a middle school in Napa, California. When Christ's Hospital surveyed its students in 2011, 95% voted to keep the traditional uniforms. I never had a uniform but it saddens me to hear that kids have to wear uniforms. In Seattle, Washington, which has a mandatory policy with an opt-out saw a decrease in truancy and.
Is wearing a uniform good or bad for students? Uniforms used at schools can range from the formal to the informal. While they make valid points I often disagree with them. At a time when schools are encouraging an appreciation of diversity, enforcing standardized dress sends a contradictory message. In 1996, only 3% of public schools in the country required students to wear them. In conclusion, while many parents acknowledge that there are pros and cons to having school uniforms, the cost is still just too much for many families. The debate over uniforms in public schools encompasses many larger issues than simply what children should wear to school.